De m?me, j'indique de rabattre les mailles ? 156 cm car cela permet de faire 2 tours de cou mais vous pouvez tr猫s bien adapter les dimensions en fonction de vos envies.??ait de vache
全体を通じて 素晴らしい物事の あなたはA + に関して。 正確な場所あなた混乱する私が個人的にことになった上すべての細目。As they say, the devil is in the details... And it could not be more correct at this point.Having said that, allow me inform you just what exactly did deliver the results.Your authoring is actually pretty engaging which is probably why I am taking an effort to opine.I do not really make it a regular habit of doing that.Next, even though I can see the jumps in logic you come up with, I am not necessarily convinced of exactly how you seem to unite the details which in turn produce the actual final result.For right now I shall subscribe to your issue however wish in the near future you actually connect the facts much better.
NEW YORK (BUSINESS WIRE) Oct. 7, 2002Magazine Recognizes an Elite, Little Known Group in Its November IssuePopular Science magazine will debut the "PopSci Brilliant10," a new editorial annual awards section, in its November issue,10," which will hit newsstands next week, is a celebration of anelite group of young scientists who are shaking up their fields andwhose work will touch all facets of life."Science is made dramatic and relevant by the incrediblepeople behind it," said Mowbray. "The men and women in ourfirst annual list are not famous yet, but they are ground breaking,risk taking, maniacally committed researchers. Most are doing work thatis ushering in technological advances that will change our lives."PopSci's "Brilliant 10," in alphabetical order, are: Angela Belcher, 35, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for her work in the field of materials science. Rather than making machines that mimic animals, she is coaxing living creatures to produce machines. Belcher, a pioneer in this field, has engineered viruses that can grow semiconductor materials, microscopic biosensors, and liquid crystal structures for computer screens or DNA storage devices. It takes her just three weeks to "evolve" a virus to produce a new substance on its surface. Manjul Bhargava, 28, Princeton University, for his work in the field of mathematics. He recently found a proof for the Fifteen Theorem that was not only simpler than past proofs but that also expanded the result so that it applied to the generation of any specific set of integers such as all the odd numbers. Raphael Bousso, 31, Harvard University, for his work in the field of physics. Bousso is using the most intricate physics to prove that the world isn't as complicated as scientists previously believed. He is one of the leading proponents of a controversial idea called the holographic principle, which, if true, would provide an important clue to how space, time, information, and the laws of physics are intertwined at the most fundamental level. David Clemmer, 37, Indiana University, for his work in the field of chemistry. Recently, scientists decoded the human genome, but the real task still lies ahead: understanding the body's proteins, which do all the heavy lifting. Clemmer has invented an instrument that can separate, sort, sift, and measure biological molecules with a speed and precision that was once unimaginable. The instrument is a key to the early effort to study the almost incalculably complex functions of proteins. Linda Griffith, 42, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for her work in the field of tissue engineering. Most recently, Griffith made a miniature "liver" on a silicon chip and is working with the government to develop it into a practical tool that, placed in soldiers' uniforms, would detect chemical and biological warfare agents. Griffith's work is at the crossroads of biology and engineering; the discipline she's helping forge envisions the body as an ever improvable product. Zoltan Haiman, 31, Princeton University, for his work in the field of cosmology. In his models, Haiman is exploring the first object to appear in the universe after its chaotic beginnings in the big bang. He uses clues what the universe looks like now, the gases known to have been circulating after the big bang, and the unchanging laws of physics to model the objects that would have formed when the universe was just a billion years old. Lydia Kavraki, 35, Rice University, for her work in the field of computer science. Kavraki began by studying how robots navigate: She created a system that randomly samples the range of poses open to the robot, creates snapshots of the machine in motion at various stages along its path, and then connects those snapshots as efficiently as possible into a kind of road map. Currently, she is looking for ways to model biological molecules to aid in the hunt for new medicines. Charles Lieber, 43, Harvard University, for his work in the field of nanotechnology. Lieber seeks to manipulate the structure of materials at the molecular level, where they exhibit unique properties. He is among the leading researchers who are actually building things at the nanometer billionth of a meter scale, from molecules created in the lab, and demonstrating their properties. Azadeh Tabazadeh, 37, NASA Ames Research Center, for her work in the field of atmospheric science. Nearly a decade ago, Azadeh Tabazadeh helped demolish the claim that human activity wasn't destroying the ozone layer, and her work helped pave the way for a landmark 1996 ban on CFC manufacturing. She is one of the first scientists to make the connection between ozone depletion and global warming. David Wagner, 28, University of California, Berkeley, for his work in the field of cryptography. Wagner has broken more than a few codes in his ongoing research to identify security holes in software, particularly software that safeguards large amounts of money or information relevant to national security. Wagner does lots of behind the scenes work, advising government agencies and software companies on how to make digital cell phones, wireless networks, encryption standards and next generation Internet protocols more secure.?縋ortland Business Journal
